Lets keep this as simple, what came first, the brain or consciousness? Some very smart people believe the brain comes first and consciousness comes second. They believe the brain gives birth to Consciousness. Lets logically break this down, everything in this relative Universe came from nothing, that includes the brain. You can break everything down to molecules and atoms but where did those molecules and atoms come from? Nothing. What is that nothing? It is called by many names, oneness, absolute, nothingness, brahman, or for the relevance of this post, consciousness. As we have spoken about in past posts, when I ask you to describe a house, the best you can do is describe parts of the house but not the whole. This house analogy was created to help people understand oneness, absolute, nothingness, brahman and consciousness. The best our minds can do, even the highest level IQ minds, because of being dualistic is describe the parts, never the whole. It must be directly experienced by letting go of what we think we know at the level of the mind. But back to what came first, nothing gave birth to everything, including the brain so to say the brain gives birth to consciousness is quite childish. Looking for consciousness inside the brain is like looking for the announcer inside a radio. You may ask, how is it possible for people to believe the brain comes first? Easy, their level of consciousness. Remember, level of intelligence does not equate to levels of consciousness and you can have a 185 IQ but if your consciousness is low, you are swimming in dirty waters where you are guessing at how the world is. Everything we see and know is consciousness, you are that consciousness, you are that movie screen that allows all of this universe to be played out on. The mistake the masses have made is identifying with what is being played on the screen and not the screen itself. As more awaken to this knowledge, less division will be created and the "better world" most have killed and fought for will be experienced without the bloodshed and conflict.
Commentaires